Dhaka, September 17, 2025:
The long day of dialogue at CIRDAP in Dhaka ended with a document that sought to carry the voices of the Rohingya beyond the walls of the auditorium. The Dhaka Declaration on Rohingya Aspirations was presented as the final chapter of today’s national dialogue, a statement meant to sharpen Bangladesh’s position and strengthen global advocacy ahead of the United Nations General Assembly.
It was not simply another communique. Organizers and participants framed the declaration as a moral and political marker: an affirmation that the Rohingya crisis must remain anchored in rights, justice, and dignity—not merely humanitarian relief.
From Aid to Dignity
The declaration begins by moving beyond the language of charity. It calls for humanitarian assistance that does not stop at survival but promotes dignity, self-reliance, and cohesion with host communities. Education, healthcare, and livelihoods are placed at the center of this vision, with a special emphasis on women and youth. Funding must come not only from traditional donors but also from OIC states and Middle Eastern partners, it argues—an acknowledgment that the global spotlight has dimmed and fresh sources of support are needed.
Rakhine: Without Reform, No Return
At the heart of the declaration lies a clear truth: without structural reform in Myanmar, repatriation will collapse under its own weight. The Rohingya must be recognized as an indigenous ethnic group; their citizenship must be restored; their freedom of movement, political rights, and access to livelihoods must be guaranteed.
The declaration also calls for inter-communal reconciliation, urging dialogue between Rohingya, Rakhine Buddhists, and other minorities. Neutral international monitoring is seen as essential to prevent future persecution. Absent these reforms, it warns, any return will not just be unsafe—it will be unsustainable.
Security as the Cross-Cutting Concern
Security runs like a thread through the declaration. In Bangladesh’s camps, crime, trafficking, and gender-based violence remain acute, while in Rakhine, fears linger of a final “clearance” operation by Myanmar’s military. The declaration stresses that guarantees of security—through international monitoring and regional cooperation—must be embedded in any solution. Without them, every other plan risks collapse.
Repatriation: Rights, Not Rhetoric
The declaration affirms what Rohingya leaders have long said: repatriation is the ultimate goal, but only if it is safe, voluntary, dignified, and rights-based. Citizenship, restitution of land and property, compensation, and international monitoring are named as preconditions. Return without rights, the declaration suggests, is simply another exile.
Elevating Rohingya Voices
One of its strongest points is the recognition of Rohingya leadership. It calls for organized civilian voices—from refugee camps, the diaspora, women and youth, and genocide survivors—to shape the path forward. Their involvement is described as indispensable to negotiation and policymaking. The declaration is blunt: without Rohingya at the table, durable solutions will remain impossible.
International Community: From Charity to Politics
The declaration presses the international community to move beyond aid and exercise political leverage. China and India are singled out as key actors, while OIC, ASEAN, and the UN are urged to intensify pressure on Myanmar. Muslim-majority countries are asked to close funding gaps, but the emphasis is not only on money. What is needed, it argues, is coordinated diplomacy and sustained political will to secure rights and safety.
Justice as a Foundation
Few lines are sharper than those on justice. Accountability is declared non-negotiable. The declaration endorses proceedings at the ICJ and ICC, as well as truth-seeking and reparations. Restorative justice, it argues, is the foundation for reconciliation and security. Without accountability, return will be fragile and trust impossible.
The Media’s Role
The declaration ends with a call to the press. Sustained, unbiased reporting is described as essential to keep the Rohingya crisis alive in global consciousness. Without coverage, the crisis risks being erased not only from Myanmar’s history but from the world’s imagination.
A Declaration of Intent, But Not Yet a Roadmap
For all its ambition, the Dhaka Declaration falls short in critical areas. It lays out aspirations, but avoids timelines. It identifies responsibilities, but does not assign them. It highlights conditions, but offers no enforcement.
The absence of a timeline means urgency risks slipping into delay. The vagueness around Bangladesh’s own role reflects domestic fears of “local integration,” but leaves unanswered how camp life will be managed in the interim. The call on China and India carries weight, but without strategy it sounds more like a plea than a plan. The lack of detail on Rohingya political representation means the very people the declaration claims to empower are still left without a guaranteed seat at the table. And without a sustainable funding plan, the humanitarian backbone of the crisis remains exposed to donor fatigue and budget cuts.
Each omission has reasons. Timelines invite political risk; stronger commitments for camp reforms risk domestic backlash; explicit strategies on China and India risk diplomatic friction; giving Rohingya formal political space risks fragmentation; and demanding long-term funding risks admitting how fragile the aid system has become. But acknowledging the reasons does not erase the consequences. For Rohingya families, these silences are not abstract—they are the gaps where lives remain stalled.
Towards Action
The Dhaka Declaration is a vital reaffirmation that the Rohingya crisis is political at its core and cannot be reduced to relief management. It speaks of dignity, rights, and justice, and re-centers the crisis at a moment when the world’s attention has drifted elsewhere.
But to become more than words, the declaration must evolve into a roadmap—time-bound, strategy-driven, and Rohingya-led. It must transform aspiration into accountability, and rhetoric into results. Until then, it remains a marker of intent: powerful, necessary, but incomplete.
For more than a million Rohingya displaced in Bangladesh, the real question is not whether the world hears their aspirations—it is whether those aspirations will ever be acted upon.
